Platform Effects¶

Multiplicative Value for Platform Companies¶

Platform companies—organizations that provide capabilities to other software factories—have unique opportunities to create value that extends beyond their immediate organization. However, these opportunities come with important constraints and strategic considerations.

Critical Principle: Platform effects should serve as investment multipliers, not primary drivers. The internal business case must work first.

Who This Section Is For¶

This guidance applies specifically to:

Platform Companies: Organizations whose products serve other software factories - Cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, GCP, etc.) - Development tools and CI/CD platforms (GitLab, GitHub, CircleCI, etc.) - Security platforms and tools (vulnerability scanners, SIEM, etc.) - Developer productivity platforms (observability, monitoring, etc.) - Infrastructure and container platforms (Kubernetes, Docker, etc.)

Not applicable to: - End-user application companies (even large ones) - Internal platform teams serving only their own organization - Security vendors selling traditional enterprise software

If you're not a platform company serving other software factories, focus on BAU vs Scaling and Evaluation Criteria instead.

The Platform Effects Principle¶

Primary Responsibility: Solve Your Own Problems First¶

Non-Negotiable Foundation: Security investments must first make business sense for your direct needs. Platform effects are enhancement factors, not justifications.

Why This Matters: - Your security team's primary responsibility is securing your software factory - Platform features that don't solve your internal problems create maintenance burden - Customer value without internal value is unsustainable - Failed internal implementations can't become successful external products

Multiplicative Opportunity: When Internal and Customer Value Align¶

The Strategic Multiplier: When security investments that solve your internal problems also benefit customer software factories, this creates additional value justifying:

• Higher investment levels than internal-only business case supports
• Faster implementation timelines with cross-functional priority
• Different prioritization relative to competing initiatives
• Market differentiation and competitive advantage opportunities

Example: Automated dependency scanning - Internal value: Reduces your security team's manual effort, improves your supply chain security posture - Customer value: Enables your customers to secure their supply chains using your platform - Platform effect: 10,000 customers using your feature = 10,000x the security value created - Competitive advantage: Security capability differentiating your platform from competitors

Platform Investment Prioritization Framework¶

Use this systematic framework to evaluate security investments when you're a platform company:

Evaluation Dimensions¶

Decision Matrix¶

Strong Internal + Strong Customer Value (Highest Priority): - Example: Automated vulnerability management solving your supply chain problems that customers can leverage - Priority: Accelerate implementation, allocate cross-functional resources, market aggressively - Timeline Impact: May justify 30-50% faster implementation than internal-only business case - Investment Level: Can justify 2-3x higher investment than internal-only features

Strong Internal + Weak Customer Value (Standard Priority): - Example: Internal compliance automation specific to your regulatory environment - Priority: Standard internal security investment evaluation using evaluation criteria - Timeline Impact: Normal implementation sequencing - Investment Level: Internal business case justification required

Weak Internal + Strong Customer Value (Avoid): - Example: Security features customers request but your team doesn't use - Priority: Decline or deprioritize—likely maintenance burden without sustainability - Warning: High risk of poor execution, customer disappointment, wasted investment

Weak Internal + Weak Customer Value (Reject): - Example: Security theater features for marketing purposes - Priority: Hard reject—diverts resources from valuable work - Risk: Damages credibility with both internal teams and customers

Customer Zero Insights and Strategic Weighting¶

The "Customer Zero" Advantage¶

Platform companies often serve as sophisticated users of their own products, providing unique insights into security challenges and solutions. Your internal security pain often represents market opportunities.

Adversary Evolution Insights: When your platform company experiences security challenges that mirror broader industry shifts, these Customer Zero insights carry additional strategic weight.

Example: Modern Supply Chain Security

Your platform company discovers that: - Automated dependency scanning significantly reduces your manual security effort - Your security team's productivity improves 3x with automated vulnerability management - Unknown dependency discovery becomes systemat

ic rather than reactive

Strategic Insight: If this internal pain point reflects modern adversary capabilities (automated discovery at scale), it likely represents a market opportunity affecting thousands of customer software factories facing the same capability gap.

Customer Zero Cost Impact Assessment¶

When evaluating internal security pain points, weight them by total organizational impact including the Customer Zero amplification factor:

Strategic Application: If a security issue category costs your organization $5M annually across these factors, and Customer Zero insights suggest this affects thousands of customers similarly, the platform investment justification becomes compelling:

• Internal problem: $5M annual cost
• Customer impact: Thousands of factories facing similar issues
• Platform solution value: Addresses market need while solving internal problem
• Competitive differentiation: Security capability competitors may lack

Implementation Prioritization for Platform Companies¶

When you've identified a security investment with both internal and customer value, use this sequencing approach:

Phase 1: Internal Implementation and Validation (Critical)¶

Objective: Solve your own problem first, learn from real usage

Activities: - Implement security capability solving your internal team's pain - Use internally with realistic production workloads - Measure actual impact on your security team's effectiveness - Iterate based on internal feedback and usage patterns

Success Criteria: - Your security team actively uses and values the capability - Measurable improvement in internal security metrics - Positive feedback from internal stakeholders - Sustainable operational model established

Timeline: 3-6 months typically

Phase 2: Customer Zero Learnings Integration¶

Objective: Refine based on internal experience before customer exposure

Activities: - Document lessons learned from internal implementation - Identify operational challenges and edge cases discovered - Develop customer-facing documentation based on internal experience - Create support and troubleshooting guidance from real issues

Success Criteria: - Clear understanding of capability limitations and tradeoffs - Documented best practices from internal usage - Realistic customer expectations established - Support burden manageable based on internal experience

Timeline: 1-2 months typically

Phase 3: Limited Customer Beta (If Customer Value Validated)¶

Objective: Validate customer value hypothesis with friendly customers

Activities: - Select 3-5 sophisticated customers for beta program - Provide hands-on support during initial adoption - Measure customer outcomes and gather detailed feedback - Validate that customer experience matches your internal experience

Success Criteria: - Customers achieve measurable security improvements - Feedback validates value hypothesis - Support burden matches predictions - Customers actively use capability (not just enable it)

Timeline: 3-6 months typically

Phase 4: General Availability (Only If Beta Succeeds)¶

Objective: Scale capability to broader customer base

Activities: - Polish customer experience based on beta feedback - Scale support infrastructure for broader adoption - Market capability emphasizing customer outcomes - Monitor adoption and iterate based on usage patterns

Success Criteria: - Adoption rates meet targets - Customer satisfaction scores strong - Support burden sustainable - Competitive differentiation realized

Security as Competitive Advantage¶

Market Differentiation Questions¶

Evaluate whether security investments create defensible competitive advantages:

1. Does this capability create defensible competitive advantages? - Is this difficult for competitors to replicate? - Does this build on unique platform strengths? - Can this become customer-facing product value driving adoption?

2. Does this enable market expansion? - Does improved security enable entry into regulated industries? - Can this support enterprise customer requirements? - Does this address blockers in sales pipeline?

3. How does this compare to competitor security offerings? - Do competitors offer similar capabilities? - Is your implementation meaningfully better? - Can customers easily switch to competitors?

4. What is the thought leadership opportunity? - Can this position you as security innovation leader? - Does this enable industry standard or best practice development? - Will this attract top security talent to your organization?

Communication Strategy for Platform Companies¶

Critical Balance: Platform companies must clearly communicate that platform security capabilities serve dual purposes—protecting the platform while enabling customer security—without creating unrealistic expectations about security responsibility transfer.

Good Communication Example:

"Our automated dependency scanning capability protects our platform and is available to help you secure your software factory. This tool provides vulnerability detection and remediation guidance, but you remain responsible for reviewing findings and making security decisions appropriate to your risk tolerance and operational context."

Bad Communication Example (Avoid):

"Our platform handles your security, so you don't need to worry about vulnerabilities." [Implies accountability transfer]

Platform Effect Measurement¶

Track these metrics to validate platform effects investment strategy:

Internal Metrics (Primary)¶

• Internal security improvement: Your team's security posture improvements
• Internal operational efficiency: Reduced manual effort, faster incident response
• Internal developer satisfaction: Your engineers' experience with security capabilities

Customer Metrics (Secondary)¶

• Customer adoption rates: Percentage of customers using platform security capabilities
• Customer security outcomes: Measurable improvements in customer security postures
• Customer satisfaction scores: NPS or similar for security features
• Customer retention impact: Reduced churn attributable to security capabilities

Competitive Metrics (Strategic)¶

• Market differentiation: Customer acquisition attributable to security capabilities
• Thought leadership indicators: Conference talks, standards adoption, media coverage
• Talent attraction: Security engineer recruiting success, employer brand strength

Common Platform Company Pitfalls¶

Pitfall 1: Building for Customers Before Internal Validation¶

Symptom: Platform features your own security team doesn't use

Consequence: Poor quality, unsustainable support burden, customer disappointment

Solution: Always implement internally first, validate value, then consider customer availability

Pitfall 2: Overselling Security Responsibility Transfer¶

Symptom: Marketing language implying customers can "let platform handle security"

Consequence: Customer misunderstanding, blame when security issues occur, legal/liability concerns

Solution: Clear shared responsibility communication, explicit customer accountability

Pitfall 3: Platform Effect as Primary Driver¶

Symptom: Investments justified by customer value without internal business case

Consequence: Unsustainable features, internal team resistance, maintenance burden

Solution: Require internal business case independence, use customer value as multiplier only

Pitfall 4: Ignoring Customer Zero Insights¶

Symptom: Internal security pain dismissed as "just our problem"

Consequence: Missed market opportunities, competitive disadvantage

Solution: Systematic assessment whether internal pain represents broader market need

Next Steps¶

1. Assess Platform Company Status: Confirm whether platform effects guidance applies to your organization
2. Evaluate Current Investments: Review security investments through platform effects lens
3. Prioritize Internal Value: Ensure internal business cases are solid before considering customer value
4. Review Evaluation Criteria: Systematic framework works for all security investments
5. Consider Customer Zero Insights: Identify internal pain representing market opportunities

Back to BAU vs Scaling Continue to Evaluation Criteria

Edit this page